This blog initially set out to focus primarily on Islam and the Islamisation of the UK. However, since that time the subjects covered have broadened. They now include (amongst other things): IQ tests, Jean Baudrillard, global warming, sociobiology, Marxism, Trotskyism, David Cameron, Foucault, Nazism, Ralph Miliband, economics, statistics and so on. - Paul Austin Murphy
I've had articles published in The Conservative Online, American Thinker, Intellectual Conservative, Human Events, Faith Freedom, Brenner Brief (Broadside News), New English Review, etc... (Paul Austin Murphy's Philosophy can be found here.)

Friday, 27 January 2017

Leftism is a Violent Expression of Politics

Leftism often - very often! - expresses itself in violence and subjugation.

At the bottom level, you have the "anti-fash" herds of young anarchists and Trotskyists (all dressed in the same way and thinking the same thoughts) inflicting violence on all the Nazifascistracist bigots who don't believe exactly what they believe.

At a slightly higher level, you have groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center, Hope Not Hate, Unite Against Fascism, etc. closing down free speech and the right to demonstrate.

Historically, you have Lenin's coup in 1917, Stalin's mass murder, Chairman Mao's (student) Red Guards, Pol Pot my-Marxism-is purer-than-yours slaughter. You have Fidel Castro killing thirty thousand political prisoners in thirty years.

Now you have Leftist student unions closing down free speech, Leftists physically attacking political opponents, and countless other acts of violence from the "pacifist Left".

International Socialism (like National Socialism in the 1930s) has become so violent and intolerant in recent months and years that you'd think they were trying to match Pol Pot and Stalin. (“We are not Stalinists!”) Yes, another act of violence against a Trump supporter; another right-wing academic fired from a university; another meeting (not in tune with Leftism) cancelled. 

International Socialism (InterNazism) is political violence. It never really relied on the vote. It always relied on violence and political activism. These things look impressive on the day (such as the recent large demos); yet, in terms of the numbers of entire populations, they're a tiny elite – a violent, snobby and patronising “vanguard”.

Wednesday, 25 January 2017

Ding dong Baghdadi the baddie is... nearly dead!

Within days of Donald Trump becoming President of the United States, news is coming through that ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi has - according to local reports - been “critically injured in air strikes in northern Iraq”. The bombing raid in Al-Ba’aj (northern Iraq) was led by a US-led coalition.

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is, of course, the world's most wanted man. Nonetheless, it now has to be said that it's been reported before that al-Baghdadi has either been hurt or killed.

We can only hope that the bastard is dead.

Just to fill in the gaps. Al-Baghdadi has only just delivered his first message in over a year. This soi-disant caliph, in his most Muhammadan mode, told the Islamic world to make infidel blood “flow like rivers”.

Indeed it was only last month that the US government increased the bounty for Baghdadi from $10 million to $25 million. That bounty will now be given to anyone who comes forward with information about his whereabouts.

Not surprisingly, Baghdadi has kept a low profile in recent months. It's been reported that al-Baghdadi sleeps underground in a suicide vest. Because of all that, the British politician Boris Johnson had this to say on the pious Muslim man:

It is a cruel irony that some of the intelligence we have, you may know, suggests that the gentleman in question has actually vacated the scene himself and is nonetheless using internet media to encourage people to take part in violence.”

In terms of recent history, Baghdadi has ruled over Mosul for two years. In that time he's applied a full and blood-soaked sharia law to both Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

If he is dead, then that fact can beg a question: Why didn't this happen before Trump was elected? Why can't a superpower defeat an an enemy in the desert? The situation and geography in Iraq and Syria, after all, isn't at all like the dense and expansive forests of, say, Vietnam.

Perhaps it was because the willpower wasn't really there. Because total war and a quick victory were never on the cards. Wars with much bloodshed don't play well on the TV. And, of course, left-wing professional and amateur demonstrators quickly arrive on the streets. Yet these pretend pacifists make things worse: they prolong the war and the overall death-count. In addition, it's also because Leftist activists, lawyers and newspapers severely limit - through lawfare and negative criticism - the ability of the US to fight for victory and defeat the enemy.

Tuesday, 24 January 2017

Three Blessed Counterjihadists: Dalai Lama, Archbishop of Pompeii, Rabbi Goldschmidt

Has the Dalai Lama been placed on the Southern Poverty Law Center's“Hatewatch” list? Has Britain's Hope Not Hate or Fiyaz Mughal's Tell Mama asked for the British government to ban the Tibetan Buddhist from the United Kingdom?

You may wonder why I'm asking these seemingly curious questions. I'll tell you why.

In May, the Dalai Lama - when interviewed by the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung - said that there were “too many” refugees in Europe. He warned that Germany “cannot become an Arab country”. Indeed he went on to say that Arab refugees should only be “admitted temporarily”.

What about the Italian Archbishop - Monsignor Carlo Liberati (the Archbishop Emeritus of Pompeii) - who recently warned that the whole of Europe will “soon be Muslim”?

Is he a Naziracistfascist bigot?

In any case, the Archbishop has predicted the continued ethnic-cleansing and displacement of European Christians; which will be due, primarily, to declining Christian birthrates comparative to Muslim families.

In the Catholic Journal La Fede Quotidiana, Monsignor Carlo Liberati went on to say:

"Parishes are the only thing still standing. We need a true Christian life. All this paves the way to Islam. In addition to this, they have children and we do not. We are in full decline.

"In 10 years we will all be Muslims because of our stupidity."

Now for Moscow's chief rabbi, Pinchas Goldschmidt. He wrote - in the UK's Telegraph - that "we must realise that we have now entered a religious war".

I also wonder or not the Washington Institute (an American think tank) has incurred the righteousness of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Hope not Hate, CAIR and Tell Mama because of its anticipation of a future religious war. After all, the Washington Institute said:

"The Crusades began with a rumour of defilement. In 1095, Pope Urban II denounced the Muslims as 'a race utterly alienated from God'.

"This is exactly how Islam's leaders are demonising the West in the 21st."

The Washington Institute went on to argue that at some point "the crusade" will begin. That crusade "would be a Muslim one". Why? Because "its advance scouts are already at work in Europe".

Are the Dalai Lama, the Archbishop Emeritus of Pompeii and the chief Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt “far Right”? It seems so. That, by Leftist definition, to be against Islamisation and mass immigration is to be far Right.

So let's happily and freely bite that bullet: We are far Right!


Thus is it any wonder that there's been a rise in popularity for various right-wing parties across Europe?

Is France's Front National – which has seen its support triple in five years - fundamentally at odds with the religious representatives above? And what makes Germany's Alternative for Germany (AfD) – which is at its strongest ever - position fundamentally different to that of the Dalai Lama?

Finally, in May 2015, Alternative for Germany party declared - in its manifesto - that "Islam is not part of Germany".

Does Islam really have a place anywhere in Europe?